| Format | Results | Won batting first | Median first-innings total | Toss winner won | Chose to bowl first | No winner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T20 and shorter | 2,294 | 47% | 159 | 52% | 67% | 1% |
| One-day cricket | 529 | 46% | 256 | 50% | 61% | 1% |
| Tests and first-class | 403 | 53% | 288 | 48% | 56% | 29% |
2,294 results from 60 competitions
529 results from 15 competitions
403 results from 13 competitions
Finished matches from Sportmonks, a licensed cricket data provider, checked by FairPlay before they are stored. Nothing is typed in by hand.
The last 12 months of results, grouped into T20, one-day and first-class formats. Super overs are left out of limited-overs totals; rain-shortened matches stay in.
Teams need 10 results and venues 8 before they are ranked. The figures are FairPlay's own, not official records, and they describe the past only.
From finished matches in FairPlay's verified Sportmonks match data. FairPlay checks each result before storing it and calculates every figure on these pages itself.
Each page reads the latest stored results when it loads. A result is stored within about a minute of the match-data source marking a match finished.
FairPlay publishes player tables only when it holds complete scorecards for every match in the period, so that no player is missed. Until then, player figures appear on each match centre scorecard and on player pages, which cover only the matches with a full FairPlay scorecard. Players are linked from scorecards, line-ups and team pages.
No. Official records are kept by the ICC and national boards. FairPlay's figures cover only the matches in its feed for the last 12 months.
Win percentage compares a team only with its own results. Teams in different competitions rarely play each other, so the table does not show that one team is stronger than another.
No. They describe what has already happened. FairPlay's rates come from a separate, tested pricing model, explained on the FairPlay rates page.
